They look a little different on the outside. If we were to conduct a taste test, undoubtedly we would find that they taste a little different. Mmmmm.... Yeah. Slightly different flavors. Also, we would find that people would likely express a preference - one brand tastes better than the other.
They're both still ketchup.
*This has been a presentation of the American electoral process brought to you by the letter god help us and the number wake the fuck up.
I thought, what better time than now to run through the top 15 money donors for Obama and McCain (as of June 2008). Looking at these lists now casts a new light on recent events and possibly offers some glimpse of the future.
The dollar amounts listed are the sum of $200+ contributions from employees of these corporations or institutions given either directly or through PACs administered by these entities. Some links are provided for entities the reader may be unfamiliar with.
McCain
Merrill Lynch $226,550 Blank Rome LLP$222,050 Citigroup Inc $206,102 Greenberg Traurig LLP$173,837 AT&T Inc $149,305 Goldman Sachs $128,770 Morgan Stanley $124,951 JPMorgan Chase & Co $123,450 Credit Suisse Group $115,625 Lehman Brothers $98,400 Univision Communications $87,000 Bank of New York Mellon $86,500 Blackstone Group $86,350 IDT Corp$84,850 Wachovia Corp $84,050
Obama
Goldman Sachs $554,481 University of California $371,266 UBS AG$363,257 JPMorgan Chase & Co $353,808 Citigroup Inc $331,946 National Amusements Inc$313,511 Lehman Brothers $312,597 Google Inc $293,974 Harvard University $292,441 Sidley Austin LLP$287,795 Skadden, Arps et al$266,413 Morgan Stanley $253,576 Jones Day$245,875 Time Warner $245,828 Exelon Corp$229,861
This post is for my bud Shemp Messing. I thought he would especially appreciate this. By now it's common knowledge that Sarah Palin supported the "Bridge to Nowhere" until she realized she could get further politically by opposing it. What fewer people know is that though the bridge project was scrapped, Gov. Palin gladly kept the earmarked money intended for the bridge and spent it on other pork projects instead. But I digress... Though it may be through a consistently repeated false boast, Palin has attempted to cultivate this image of a mavericky reformer who is absolutely totally against federal earmarks. Her track record paints a different picture.
"In 2000, as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, Palin hired a lobbyist for $24,000 a year (later increased to $36,000) to make the federal monies rain on her fair city (pop. 6,700). The rain came down: $500,000 to purchase a parcel of federal land; $450,000 for rehabilitating an agricultural processing plant; $15 million for a rail project to connect the city with Girdwood, Alaska. All told, during Palin's last for years in office, Wasilla received $26.9 million in earmarks. That total is roughly the same amount that Boise, Idaho, received during the same period. Not a bad haul for Palin, considering Wasilla's population is 28 times smaller than Boise's." [In These Times 10.08]
If the right to vote in this country is in any way important to you, watch these videos. Tell everyone you know to watch them. The first two are from a talk Greg Palast and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. gave last year on Mayday in New York City and run about 10 minutes each. The third one is also produced Palast and provides excellent summary of the current controversies swirling aroung voting and voter fraud in the upcoming presidential election - it is roughly 15 minutes. The last one is a mini-interview Palast did with Sari Gelzer, a reporter from Truthout, in which he covers the ways you can "Steal Back Your Vote" and make sure it gets counted - it's only 5 minutes. Watch them all. Tell your friends.
“a Right which all Freemen claim . . . they have a right publickly to remonstrate the Abuses of Power in the strongest Terms, to put their neighbours upon their Guard against the Craft or open Violence of Men in Authority, and to assert with Courage the Sense they have of the Blessings of Liberty, the Value they put upon it, and their Resolution at all Hazards to preserve it as one of the greatest Blessings Heaven can bestow.” -Andrew Hamilton at the trial of John Peter Zenger
It might take all day to get into all the things seriously wrong with the DNC and the RNC. If you look out your window and see the inside of a handbasket, the events surrounding these conventions may indicate why.
Since my post about the arrests of the "Democracy Now!" people, I have seen nor heard a single thing about it anywhere mainstream media. There has been no coverage of the 10,000+ peaceful protesters at the RNC, and no coverage of the "violent" clashes with the police by small groups after the protest.
The police, it seems have taken a new tactic. Modeled after the Iraq war perhaps. The preemptive strike. Let's start with I-Witness Video. They are a New York based collective that uses the power of video to protect civil liberties and the right to use public space, particularly in the context of First Amendment activity such as demonstrations, marches and rallies.
"I-Witness Video uses video to protect civil liberties. We probe police actions at First Amendment events. I-Witness Video has uncovered perjury and abuse by police officers and prosecutors, revealed illegal police surveillance and exposed official lies."
The house in St. Paul where the collective members were staying was raided by the police.
"The incident began in the late morning when an FBI agent and a Wisconsin Deputy Sheriff showed up on the doorstep of the house in which members were staying (on Igelhart St.), interrupting a collective planning meeting. The officers left after a short conversation with members through a locked front door. Two hours later, around 30 police surrounded the house. Two people who left the house were detained in handcuffs; several others, who were inside, were told that if they left, they would be also be detained. Around the same time, three other I-Witness Video members who had left the house on bikes and two others who were riding in a car across town were also detained by police.
Two hours later, after the search warrant arrived, police at the Igelhart Street house stormed in, pointing an automatic handgun at the people inside. They handcuffed all the individuals inside, collected their personal information, and corralled them in the back garden. While police held the media activists and their friends there, members of the media, who had gathered in an adjoining backyard, interviewed I-Witness Video member Eileen Clancy from behind a fence. After completing their search, the police finally uncuffed everyone and departed. Within about two hours, the other I-Witness Video groups--who had been detained on bikes and in a car, all of whom also had their identifications verified and had undergone searches of various kinds--were also released.
During the raids, members of I-Witness Video managed to send out several email and text messages to supporters, legal support, and press. In response, hundreds of people called the office of the St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman.
Among those individuals detained was Democracy Now! producer Elizabeth Press, who had her camera with her throughout the incident. This morning, Democracy Now! ran a news segment on the many preemptive raids that police have launched against activists in St. Paul this month, including the raid that I-Witness Video suffered on Saturday.
This was a clear effort to intimidate and undermine the work of I-Witness Video--a group that was remarkably successful in exposing police misconduct and outright perjury by police during the 2004 RNC. Out of 1800 arrests made that week, at least 400 were overturned based solely on video evidence which contradicted sworn statements by police officers." [I-Witness Video Blog]
From The Minneapolis/St. Paul Star Tribune:
In a statement Saturday morning, Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher said the St. Paul raid targeted the RNC Welcoming Committee, a group he described as "a criminal enterprise made up of 35 self-described anarchists...intent on committing criminal acts before and during the Republican National Convention."
Is this fucking Minority Report? We go after people BEFORE they commit a crime? This phrase in his statement kills me: "intent on committing criminal acts". What the fuck? This can't really be happening, can it?
Yes. In another police raid in south Minneapolis they broke down the door and arrested the owner of the house.Then the City inspector arrived and proceeded to board up the house because the door was broken.When lawyers arrived and asked the inspector if he got the owner's permission, the inspector said the owner was unavailable.(conveniently in jail)
Bruce Nestor of the National Lawyers Guild talks about the raid (7min.):
In another incident, the Police stopped an activist bus, kicked everyone off, took it and left them on the side of the road. The video is short and shitty because it was shot with a cell phone, but you can clearly see at least 10 police vehicles, the green bus with an earth activist slogan on it, and the stranded passengers.(1.5min.)
Perhaps you heard about the "Free Speech Zones" at the DNC far away from the actual convention center. A guy by the name of Toby Grace said it best:
"We had been under the perhaps erroneous impression that the entire United States was a free speech zone."
This piece by Matt Taibbi shows the stark and ridiculous contrast between the "Free Speech Zone" at the DNC and the posh corporate parties held all week for the delegates. This is disgraceful:(5min)
This article from the British site Ekklesia gives a good summary. Why is it that the BBC is the only network that has footage of the protests? Which incidentally, shows no violence.
There is also this wonderful FBI flyer I came across a while back:
Read the back carefully.
This is just the tip of the iceberg my friends. It only gets worse. Please tell people you know about this, otherwise it's unlikely they will ever find out about it. Most of these videos only have like 5,000 hits. These are dangerous times - preserve the rights we have while we still can.
Michael Pollan is the director of the Knight Program in Science and Environmental Journalism at UC Berkeley, also an author and New York Times Magazine contributor. His book "The Omnivore’s Dilemma" explains how our food not only affects our health but has far-reaching political, economic, and environmental implications. In this video he asks some really interesting questions that will make you take a step back and think about everything you think you know about humanity's place in the natural world. After watching the video, you may have a different experience the next time you mow your lawn. The blurb from the TED site:
What if human consciousness isn't the end-all and be-all of Darwinism? What if we are all just pawns in corn's clever strategy game to rule the Earth? Author Michael Pollan asks us to see the world from a plant's-eye view.
The video is a little over 17 minutes long but it is well worth watching. For the naysayers who question organic farming, and the ability of those methods to produce the same kind of output as modern industrial farming, there is a must watch section roughly 10 minutes in about Polyface Farm in Virginia operated by Joel Salatin.